Mark Farrell I understand your not digidesign specialists therefore any advice on the mbox would be unsupported. But i’ve used the MBOX with pro tools 6 PT 6.4 PT 7.0 PT 7.4 and now PT 8.0 All have been compatible with the original MBOX and have always allowed me to choose 128 buffer settings that have worked. Right now i can use PT 8 superior 2.0 at 128 and its great to record to. So what would be the reason that outside of PT on the same computer im getting latency? It doesnt seem to make sense because wouldnt the asio drivers im using for toontrack solo be the same ones that are being used for PT?
Im just trying to think laterally, to find out what could possibly be the issue. Unfortunatly my geekiness only goes this far.
Obviously you think this is an MBOX issue, which is fine, i only disagree because its worked in the past and for other VI’s. VI’s are unusable once you hit the 256 or higher buffer settings but i’ve been using them for years with an mbox at 128. And it is definatly working at 128 because the difference between 128 and 256 is very noticable. I will post in the DUC forum and see what people say. But the most important thing im asking is can you look past the MBOX issue. If i’d said i’ve got an MBOX 2 and i have this problem, what would be your next step for advice? Could anything else disturb the asio drivers but only whilst in solo mode? as it works perfectly at 128 in Pro tools.
No products in the cart.
Get all the latest on new releases,
updates and offers directly to your inbox.
Note: By clicking the 'I WANT IN' button, you will not be creating a Toontrack user account. You will only sign up to get our newsletters, offers and promotions to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time from a link at the bottom of each email. If you want to learn more about our privacy policy, please find detailed information here.
