Replies created

 

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Peter Engdahl
    Participant

    Thanks for the replies.

    Yeah, I know the paths and I’ve tried it several times. Uninstalled and reinstalled several times, every time making sure I had the right path, but nothing.
    And now I just uninstalled EZplayer again, did a completely new installation again of the 64bit version, making sure it was installed in the right place and
    that I had the right path set in Solo, and no, it didn’t work.
    But I thought “hey, I’ll even try the 32bit version” which I have never tried before since it’s 64bit machine, running 64bit stuff only so why should I?
    I’ve never installed any 32bit software on this computer, but now I did, and now it works. Why? It’s just weird to me.

    Anyways, thanks for the help.

    Oh, but maybe I could ask you another thing it it’s okay to do that here John?

    I’m thinking of getting the crossgrade to SD 2.0 and I know that all the EZX’s will work in it, but my question is basically,
    how much harder will it be for my system to run SD 2.0 than EZD? I’m basically just gonna stick with the EZX’s that I have
    but I’d like the feature of adding extra drums and setting up my owns kits with x-drums but probably not stack lots of
    different samples on top of each other. And I’ve heard that SD is supposed to sound better and less “machine gun”-like when
    doing stuff like blast beats, and that the velocity is better, so that’s another reason.
    I understand that it might be hard to tell, but like I said, I’m not going for the SDX sets that needs a lot of processing but stick
    with the EZX’s since I believe they sound really good already, I just want the extra type of control that I mentioned.

    I’ll move this to another place if it’s wrong, but I thought I’d just ask since I already had this one going.

    Cheers,
    Peter

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)

No products in the cart.

×