Toontrack Support Forum Toontrack Support Forum

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

EZDrummer vs Superior Drummer - noticeable difference in sound quality?

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Customer Service] >> EZdrummer Pre-sales >> EZDrummer vs Superior Drummer - noticeable difference in sound quality? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
EZDrummer vs Superior Drummer - noticeable difference i... - Nov.-3th-2010 4:04:02   
jgro002

 

Posts: 159
Score: 0
Joined: Nov.-24th-2009
Status: offline
Hi there,

I am looking at getting the bottom-of-the-line 13" Macbook Pro (2.4 GHz, 4Gb, 250 gig hard drive) - I have Superior Drummer and a bunch of expansions, but I am seriously considering loading the new laptop with EZDrummer due to the lower resource requirements and smaller size of the libraries. (By the way I know I can use Superior Drummer in 16-bit, cache mode etc to save on resources).

Anyway, my question is how the EZX libraries compare sound-wise to their SDX big-brothers. Eg. how does Vintage EZX sound compared to C&V SDX? How does Nashville EZX sound compared to Music City SDX? Etc.

Specifically, how does having the samples only available as 16-bit and having fewer samples and fewer available velocity layers in the EZXs affect the realism that one is able to achieve? Do any commercial albums/songs use EZDrummer in the final mix, or is EZDrummer really aimed at being more of a 'demo'/home-user's tool?

Cheers,
Jeremy.

_____________________________

iMac 3.06 GHz 4 GB OSX 10.6.5, Focusrite Saffire 6 USB, Logic Pro 9.1.3, Lacie D2 Quadra
Post #: 1
RE: EZDrummer vs Superior Drummer - noticeable differen... - Nov.-3th-2010 11:58:41   
Rogue

 

Posts: 7533
Score: 22
Status: offline
EZX-s can most definitely be used in professional productions, and are on a common basis (particularly in music to film). EZX-s are 'out-of-the-box' sound sets made by professionals and the 16/24 bit aspect is 100% irrelevant if you are content with the outboard processing that has been done (or at least like the 'ballpark' territory).

As to the sample pool reduction it depends on how you program your drums, there is a 'lazy' way which consists of drawing notes all at the same velocity and another which is to either use the provided grooves (with ad-hoc edits), program carefully your parts, or play them in. For all these methods but the very first, the reduced pool is more than adequate.

So, IMO, while there is no question that the raw to mildly produced sounds of SDX-s, extended sample pool (or rather full/original), and extra microphones (and extra articulations) are a Superior tool (pun intended) in the right hands, if your mixing skills are not up to scratch then an EZX can come in very handy without compromising much.

Anyway there are no single answer to your question, each individual is different. For me, EZX-s in Superior are the best solution most of the time. Where appropriate I do switch to the Superior equivalent (Nashville to Music City most frequently, but recently MetalHeads to Metal Foundry) but that's usually to render tracks for someone else to mix. YMMV.

_____________________________

Post #: 2
RE: EZDrummer vs Superior Drummer - noticeable differen... - Nov.-3th-2010 17:49:28   
jgro002

 

Posts: 159
Score: 0
Joined: Nov.-24th-2009
Status: offline
Hi Rogue,

Thanks for the detailed answer.

Cheers,
Jeremy.

_____________________________

iMac 3.06 GHz 4 GB OSX 10.6.5, Focusrite Saffire 6 USB, Logic Pro 9.1.3, Lacie D2 Quadra
Post #: 3
RE: EZDrummer vs Superior Drummer - noticeable differen... - Nov.-4th-2010 1:07:50   
jgro002

 

Posts: 159
Score: 0
Joined: Nov.-24th-2009
Status: offline
Hi Rogue (again),

so does
quote:

the 16/24 bit aspect is 100% irrelevant if you are content with the outboard processing that has been done (or at least like the 'ballpark' territory)
mean that if you start to further process the 16-bit samples with eqs, comps etc that that is when you will start to notice a difference in quality? If you could please elaborate on what you were saying there I would be appreciative.

Cheers,
Jeremy.

_____________________________

iMac 3.06 GHz 4 GB OSX 10.6.5, Focusrite Saffire 6 USB, Logic Pro 9.1.3, Lacie D2 Quadra
Post #: 4
RE: EZDrummer vs Superior Drummer - noticeable differen... - Nov.-4th-2010 7:56:20   
John

 

Posts: 4295
Score: 6
Joined: Jun.-28th-2004
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Status: offline
I don't think it's about quality as much as it is about applying EQ's and Comp's to already EQ'd and Comp'd material. Sometimes it's OK to add a spoon of sugar to the cream but sometimes it's not;-)

_____________________________

Post #: 5
RE: EZDrummer vs Superior Drummer - noticeable differen... - Nov.-4th-2010 19:16:58   
jgro002

 

Posts: 159
Score: 0
Joined: Nov.-24th-2009
Status: offline
Hi John,

Thanks for that. The only reason I asked about processing the 16-bit samples producing a noticeable difference in sound quality is that Mattias talked about it in the Superior Drummer tutorial videos that are up on the Toontrack site. Neil Dorfsman asked him if there was a noticeable difference in sound quality between the 16-bit and 24-bit bit files and Mattias said something along the lines of "sure if you start processing them you'll hear a difference". Obviously because they were talking about the Superior Drummer samples, the difference Mattias was referring to was not going to be so much to do with processing on top of already processed drums (since Superior is much less pre-processed than EZdrummer). The inference I got from it was that because the files were 16-bit they would react differently (in terms of quality) to compression, eq etc than 24-bit samples would. I was just wondering how subtle that difference would be. I think chances are I wouldn't be able to tell the difference at all.

Cheers,
Jeremy.

_____________________________

iMac 3.06 GHz 4 GB OSX 10.6.5, Focusrite Saffire 6 USB, Logic Pro 9.1.3, Lacie D2 Quadra
Post #: 6
RE: EZDrummer vs Superior Drummer - noticeable differen... - Nov.-5th-2010 11:34:22   
Rogue

 

Posts: 7533
Score: 22
Status: offline
it depends on the source instrument, the processing applied, and more generally the exact audio and FX chain involved.

The point I made as a passing note was, exactly as John eloquently put it, that EZX-s are designed to be pre-processed to fit in a mix. If that sound is nothing like what you envisage as an end result then starting from an un- or lightly compressed/EQed source is a better choice, and the extended bit depth may/will help retaining the sonic integrity/quality throughout the bit mangling steps.

_____________________________

Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Customer Service] >> EZdrummer Pre-sales >> EZDrummer vs Superior Drummer - noticeable difference in sound quality? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.367